Thursday, September 24, 2009

Judge Upholds Eviction of Mom of 6.

That headline is from the Altoona Mirror, September 24, 2009. And one would be forgiven for asking, where's the compassion? How could he do such a heartless thing? Let's go to the story itself, because it's instructive of the kind of tragedy created (I submit, intentionally) by generations of social engineers in the inner cities. And now it's spreading to smaller towns.

Shaquita...

We pause after the first word in the story because that's the first hint that trouble's afoot. Social engineers have created an inner city culture that separates itself from (and often visibly despises) the rest of America. One demarcation line is the invention of new names. Not that there's anything wrong with creating new names in a country with 300 million people. We can only have so many "Mikes." It's just that the practice pretty much started in some of the worst communities in the country. So as soon as you hear "Shaquita," you can pretty safely guess that something bad's coming next. Rarely do you see the name "Shaquita" followed by the words, "won a prestigious award."

Shaquita Young, 28, who came to Altoona three years ago from Chicago...

She left a bustling city three years ago to come to a contracting small town with a rampant drug problem and overly generous access to welfare. That rampant drug problem started after someone in Altoona (too cowardly to step up and take credit) put the word out to New York City, New Jersey, Philly and other inner city Meccas that Housing Authority-owned dwellings in Altoona were abundant and vacant (due to lack of need). (Aside: How long do you think Altoona will be a solid Republican vote with people moving in from big city slums? Do you honestly believe that's not by design?)

... said she didn't know what she was going to do.

Young, whose children range in age from 8 months to 11 years...

Another staple of the leftist-designed inner city: illegitimate children, helping to realize Karl Marx' dream of the destruction of the traditional family. Who needs a family with a dad bringing home the bacon when the government cuts a check to replace him? This reality is learned young, as evidenced by the fact that Shaquita was a mom at 17. So she very well could have been pregnant at 16.

Let's skip down the story fo find out who fathered that child when Shaquita was 17...

She said the father of her oldest son "did terrible things" in Chicago, and in retaliation, his brother and grandmother were gunned down. She said the killings stemmed from gang activity.

I won't comment on the abject stupidity of getting knocked up by a gang banger, but focus on another staple of the social engineered inner city: the gang. An expensive yet worthless government education system produces men with no skills other than to gang up and peddle dope. And of course, vote for people who play the race card and promise more welfare or more money for inner city schools. But not school choice, of course. These inner city kids might become productive citizens who don't need welfare. Too big a risk for the political poverty pimps.

The children's fathers...

Note the plurals. Yet another result of the welfare culture and another nail in the coffin of the traditional family. ("Yay!" cried Karl Marx.)

The children's fathers do not contribute to their support.

Of course they don't. They don't have to. The government has a check ready for those kids and their mom. And if the fathers are all the caliber of daddy #1, what would they contribute? Weed?

The leaders of the American left have sold society-dividing snake oil from a bottle labeled "compassion" since the 1950s. The result: people who create not only their own hell, but one for the next generation. And the next. And the next...

Find the compassion there for me. Because frankly, I'm having a hard time finding it. And no one who looks closely can honestly see it either, especially the people who created this mess.

Everything is working out for Shaquita just the way it was designed to. I don't for a minute believe that the politicians who have peddled this "compassion" have ever thought that it would help people escape poverty. They wrapped their malicious scheme in Christian-baiting words to tug at the hearts of good people who want to help. They knew it would only expand and institutionalize poverty — and their own power.

It's working perfectly.

1 comment:

  1. Dave FINALLY sent me the link to your blog, and we were laughing until crying over breakfast at Shaquita.

    ReplyDelete